![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Overview
Core Curriculum
Research Experience
Mentors
Evaluation
Overview
Cancer prevention and control is a broad concept that stretches from the laboratory
bench to the community and from prevention of disease onset to quality of
life for survivors. Continued advances in cancer prevention and control depend
on research that identifies, translates, and implements new knowledge from
diverse areas -- from molecular discovery of prevention opportunities to
community/provider interventions to increase use of prevention strategies
to the adoption of policy supported by outcomes/cost-effectiveness studies.
Research effectiveness in any one area of cancer prevention and control is enhanced by understanding the overall context and by collaborating with experts in complementary areas. In the future, the best cancer prevention and control researchers will be those who can communicate across the various continua. They will be behavioral scientists working on a community intervention to increase use of a new molecular screening test for colon cancer who also understand something about: the natural history of colon cancer; the rationale for the molecular marker; the sensitivity/specificity/and positive predictive value of the screening test; and the cost/policy implications of the screening strategy. They will be laboratory prevention scientists working on a gene-nutrient interaction who also understand something about: the epidemiologic evidence for the nutrient; the prevalence of the relevant dietary behaviors; and the barriers/promoters for changing those behaviors.
It is not necessary that everyone become expert in everything. Social psychologists do not have to be able to perform PCR reactions, and laboratory scientists do not have to debate in detail the merits of social cognitive theory v. the transtheoretical model. What is necessary is that cancer prevention and control scientists be able to communicate with a shared vocabulary. Each must recognize, appreciate, and learn from the major tenets of each other's expertise.
Multidisciplinary training with exposure to a broad spectrum of ideas and mentored collaborative research is fundamental to the development of effective cancer prevention and control researchers. Through its specialized core curriculum and mentored research experience, the CCEP focuses on training that crosses and integrates different disciplines. The flexibility in both eligibility and training allows the CCEP to enhance diversity within the field and, at the same time, provide the understanding and language for unifying that diversity.
Objectives
To prepare pre- and postdoctoral fellows for careers in interdisciplinary and
collaborative cancer prevention and control research, the CCEP has six training
objectives. Through the Program, fellows will:
- Understand the fundamental issues in cancer prevention and control;
- Develop research expertise by mastering a content area;
- Develop collaborative capability by learning the basic tenets and vocabulary of complementary content areas;
- Become competent in research methods;
- Gain mentored research experience under the guidance of a multidisciplinary team of mentors; and
- Develop professional skills required for successful research careers (such as writing grants, presenting research findings, writing for publication, etc).
As part of their postdoctoral program, physicians, nurses, and other health professionals without masters-level training are expected to pursue an advanced degree (MPH, PhD, or DrPH), primarily at the UNC-CH School of Public Health. Other postdoctoral fellows may also elect to pursue a master’s degree or to begin coursework for a Ph.D. Fellows interested in pursuing advanced degrees from the UNC Chapel Hill School of Public Health or other UNC Chapel Hill programs must separately apply to and be accepted into those programs.
Flexibility
Because the CCEP encourages diversity in background and interests, the Program
stresses flexibility in training, especially for postdoctoral fellows. Each
fellow enters the Program with an identified mentoring team that includes
a primary faculty mentor and additional faculty identified during the application
and selection process. For predoctoral fellows, the mentor and mentoring
team are principally the dissertation advisor and committee. For postdoctoral
fellows, upon entry into the Program, the Training Advisory Committee (TAC)
and prospective mentors review each fellow's prior training, assess the individual
needs, and, in collaboration with the fellows, design an appropriate training
plan.
Postdoctoral Training Plans
The training plan is key to the evaluation of postdoctoral trainee's progress.
Upon fellows' acceptance into the Program, the Training Advisory Committee,
the mentoring teams, and the fellows develop a training plan. Fellows then
annually submit training plans for review, modification (if appropriate),
and approval by the Training Advisory Committee. Plans, which are individually
tailored to fit each fellow's needs, generally have three major components:
Goals/Objectives, Core Curriculum, Research Experience. Postdoctoral fellows
and the mentoring team meet every six months with CCEP leadership to discuss
progress.
Core Curriculum
All
fellows participate in the CCEP's core curriculum that combines five required
courses, additional coursework as appropriate, and professional development/other
activities.
Required Courses
Fellows take four content courses and one professional development course.
Content courses provide fellows with a basic understanding and the common
language of the wide range of disciplines (from basic to behavioral science)
that contribute to effective cancer prevention and control. The professional
development course promotes grant writing skills.
Content Courses. All fellows take a survey course in the fundamentals of cancer prevention and control (HPM/HBHE 765/EPID 772). All fellows also take three other content courses (or their equivalents), ranging from basic science to behavioral theory. Suggested courses include:
- Cancer Pathobiology (PATH 225, Kaufmann, Spring), or Diet and Cancer (EPID/NUTR 815, Satia, Spring) or Cancer Epidemiology and Pathogenesis (EPID 770, Schroeder, Spring);
- Cancer Epidemiology Methods (EPID 771/Millikan/Fall) or Advanced Cancer Epidemiology (EPID 775, Gammon, Spring);
and - Social and Behavioral Sciences in Public Health (Theory and Methods - HBHE 730, Fisher, DeVellis, Fall) or Social Psychological Theories of Individual Health Behavior (HBHE 800, DeVellis, Spring).
Choice in required content courses provides flexibility to match fellows' backgrounds, interests, and schedules. At the same time, the courses assure that fellows receive training in the basic tenets and vocabulary of at least three major perspectives -- basic science/carcinogenesis; epidemiology; and behavioral science.
Professional Development – Grant Writing. Fellows must take a course in grant writing. Postdoctoral fellows take NUTR 880, a grant writing seminar directed by Drs. Steven Zeisel and Barry Popkin. Predoctoral fellows may take NUTR 880 or grant and proposal writing seminars offered by their home departments, such as EPID 726. Postdoctoral fellows, with an interest in a specific department, may opt to take the equivalent grant writing seminar in that department rather than NUTR 880.
Other Courses
Fellows take, as needed, other courses to develop mastery of a content area,
additional collaborative capabilities, and/or competency in research methods.
For postdoctoral fellows, the Training Advisory Committee, in collaboration
with the preceptor teams and the fellows, identify the need and/or desire
for specific coursework.
Predoctoral fellows take coursework in research methods as part of their doctoral programs. Postdoctoral fellows take research methods coursework as individual needs dictate. Options for formal training, especially for physicians, nurses, and other health care professionals include: the UNC Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Core Curriculum (RWJ Core), the Public Health Leadership Program, the Health Care and Prevention MPH program, and the Preventive Medicine Residency.
In addition to formal University-based coursework, fellows are encouraged to take short courses either on- or off-campus to enhance content and methods expertise. Off-campus programs include such opportunities as the summer cancer prevention core curriculum sponsored by the NCI's Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program and the new investigator workshops sponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. On-campus programs include an array of methods short courses through various departments and centers, such as those offered Odum Institute for Research in Social Sciences.
In addition the curriculum incorporates integrative/professional development activities, including a journal club, seminars, workshops, and other specialized activities.
Professional Development/Other Activities
Journal Club. During the spring semester, all fellows attend a weekly journal
club. At a typical session, a team of two fellows present and discuss four
to six articles that they had selected (in conjunction with the CCEP Co-director
and other faculty). Each fellow helps organize and moderate three sessions.
The weekly series ends with a series of work-in-progress presentations of
current research by fellows. As needed, during the spring the schedule is
altered to allow fellows to preview posters/presentations for upcoming professional
meetings and dissertation defenses. The series periodically devotes sessions
to special topics, such as IRB review and grant peer-review.
Special Seminars and Meetings. The CCEP and the Cancer Center also sponsor or co-sponsor special seminars or small group meetings featuring cancer prevention and control researchers. These Visiting Scholars are nationally recognized leaders in cancer prevention and control research. In addition to presenting a seminar and visiting with faculty mentors, these Visiting Scholars meet with the CCEP fellows as a group (usually at lunch). Fellows also attend seminars of interest organized by other campus groups or at nearby universities. Fellows are also encouraged to attend several of the weekly multidisciplinary clinical conferences at the NC Clinical Cancer Center. Current weekly conferences include breast, lung, and GI cancer, as well as melanoma and hematologic diseases.
Responsible Conduct of Research. During their first year of support, fellows take a week-long, summer short-course in "The Responsible Conduct of Research." Organized by Dr. David Weber and sponsored by several UNC-CH departments and centers, the course covers: Misconduct in Scientific Research; Conflicts of Interest; Ethical Use of Humans in Research; Ethical Use of Animals in Research; Responsible Authorship; Managing Scientific Data; and Patenting Biologic Material. Fellows must also complete their certification of training in the use of human subjects.
Research Experience
Purpose
The heart of CCEP is the fellow's "hands-on" mentored research experience.
Under the direction of a primary mentor and a mentoring team, each fellow develops
and conducts cancer prevention and control research. For predoctoral fellows,
the major research project is the dissertation. These fellows also participate
in other research projects as well. For postdoctoral fellows, projects may
be independently developed parts of a mentor's ongoing research program and/or
a new projects developed by the fellow. The research reinforces and applies
training from the core curriculum and demonstrates fellows' mastery of a content
area, collaborative capabilities, and competency in research methods. The research
experience also provides opportunity to develop and demonstrate important research
skills: grant writing, abstract and presentation preparation, and scientific
writing.
Outcomes and Expectations
The primary outcome is for fellows to leave the Program and develop careers
in multidisciplinary and collaborative cancer prevention and control research.
Postdoctoral fellows should “graduate” to research/teaching/service
positions. Predoctoral fellows should complete dissertations in cancer prevention
and control and “graduate” to appropriate postdoctoral positions
or research/teaching/service positions. In support of these primary outcomes,
by the end of their training all fellows are expected to have:
- Completed the core curriculum, including additional coursework requirements established by the Training Advisory Committee and the mentor team. Physician and nurse postdoctoral fellows entering without masters-level training should have obtained or be well-advanced in obtaining an advanced degree (MPH, PhD, or DrPH).
- Completed or be well-advanced in the mentored research experience, including meeting the grant writing requirement. Fellows should have: presented research at a scientific meeting; begun publishing research; and submitted proposals for funding. Depending on their point of entry into the Program, predoctoral fellows should have completed or be nearing completion of a doctoral dissertation. Predoctoral fellows should have begun the process of publishing research and begun developing funding proposals for funding.
Specific Postdoctoral Research Expectations
For postdoctoral fellows, the mentored research experience begins at entry
and lasts throughout the fellowship. Fellows participate in each of three
major required activities:
Research Projects. Under the guidance of the mentoring team, fellows design
and conduct one or more independent projects. In these projects, fellows address
aspects of research from the research question and design to the protocol,
methods, instruments, data collection, data management, analysis, and report.
Involvement of collaborating experts is expected.
Grant Writing. By the end of their second year, postdoctoral fellows write
an extramural grant proposal (R21, R01, K07/8/22 equivalent). An internal review
committee reviews and critiques the proposal. The review committee is formed
from members of the mentoring team, the Training Advisory Committee, and other
relevant faculty. Following the review, fellows are encouraged to revise and
submit the proposals for funding.
Although fellows have access to program funds to support their research, the
CCEP encourages submission of proposals to obtain intramural and/or extramural
funding.
Professional Activities. Fellows present findings at local, regional, and national
scientific meetings, as well as submit results for publication in peer-reviewed
journals. Mentors are encouraged to offer fellows appropriate participation
in review activities (e.g., joint review of manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals).
Mentors
Primary and
Team
Each fellow has a primary mentor who will lead, as appropriate a mentoring
team. Upon the fellow's admittance to the Program, the Training Advisory Committee,
in consultation with the fellow and the primary mentor, will identify faculty
with appropriate expertise to participate in the mentoring team. For many predoctoral
fellows, the mentoring team will be the dissertation committee. Throughout
the fellowship, these mentoring teams will: develop a training plan; assure
appropriate coursework and other training; identify research opportunities,
support research activities; assist with the grant writing requirement; and
assist in placement following the fellowships.
Faculty Mentors:
CCEP faculty mentors represent departments in the UNC Chapel Hill Schools of Public Health, Medicine, and Nursing, and the College of Arts. Mentors are predominantly senior faculty. Four are practicing clinicians, and one is a nurse. To learn more about a mentor, click on the name and follow the link.
CCEP Faculty
Mentors and Areas of Expertise
|
||
Name/Title |
Department | Expertise |
| Alice
Ammerman, Dr.PH. Professor/Director |
Nutrition, HPDP |
Behavior change, community-based participatory research |
| Donald
Baucom, PhD, Professor |
Psychology | Behavioral intervention, coping/quality of life, survivorship |
| Noel Brewer, PhD, Assistant Professor |
Health Behavior & Health Education |
Health communication, behavioral theory medical decision making by lay people, patients and providers |
| Marci
Campbell, PhD, RD, Professor |
Nutrition |
Behavior change; community intervention; survivorship; dissemination |
| Jo
Anne Earp, Sc.D., Professor |
Health Behavior & Health
Education |
Behavior change (screening); disparities reduction; lay health advisors |
| Eugenia
Eng, Dr.PH., Professor |
Health Behavior & Health
Education |
Community-based intervention, participatory action; lay health advisors |
| Susan
Ennett, PhD, Professor |
Health Behavior & Health
Education |
Youth/adolescent health; tobacco, other risk behaviors |
| Marilie
Gammon, PhD, Professor |
Epidemiology |
Cancer epidemiology (breast, esophageal), survivorship |
| Paul
Godley, MD, PhD, Professor |
Medicine, Epidemiology |
Prostate cancer screening, patterns of care; clinical trials; disparities reduction |
| Laura
Linnan. Sc.D., Associate Professor |
Health Behavior & Health
Education |
Behavior change; worksite interventions; survivorship |
| Robert
Millikan, D.V.M., PhD, Professor |
Epidemiology |
Cancer epidemiology; molecular epidemiology; DNA damage/repair |
| Merle
Mishel, PhD, RN Kenan Professor |
Nursing |
Psychosocial support; survivorship; breast cancer, prostate cancer |
| Andrew
Olshan, PhD, Professor, Chair |
Epidemiology | Cancer epidemiology (head and neck, pediatric), risk and prevention |
| Michael Pignone, MD, MPH Professor |
Medicine |
Decision-making, physician-patient communication, clinical epidemiology, screening |
| Barry Popkin, PhD Professor |
Nutrition |
Diet, physical activity, social determinants, global health |
| David
Ransohoff, MD, M.P.H., Professor |
Medicine, Epidemiology |
GI cancers, screening, epidemiology |
| Kurt
Ribisl, PhD, Associate Professor |
Health Behavior & Health
Education |
Tobacco and youth, tobacco policy, internet |
| Barbara Rimer, Dr.P.H. Dean, Alumni Distinguished Professor |
Health Behavior & Health
Education |
Health communication, screening, survivorship, behavior change, dissemination |
| Robert
Sandler, MD, M.P.H., Professor |
Medicine, Epidemiology |
GI cancer epidemiology, prevention, and early detection |
| Deborah
Tate, PhD, Associate Professor |
Nutrition, Health Behavior & Health Education |
Diet, physical activity, community intervention, health communication | Melissa Troester, PhD, Assistant Professor |
Epidemiology |
Molecular epidemiology, breast cancer |
| Bryan
Weiner, PhD, Professor |
Health Policy &
Administration |
Adoption/dissemination of innovation; organizational theory and behavior |
| Morris
Weinberger, PhD, Professor |
Health Policy & Administration |
Health literacy, quality of care / outcomes, patient -centered care, and primary care |
| Steven
Zeisel, MD, PhD, Kennan Professor |
Nutrition |
Chemoprevention, diet and carcinogenesis |
Evaluation
To assess fellows' progress, the Training Advisory Committee annually reviews
and evaluates fellows. As part of the annual selection process, returning predoctoral
fellows annually apply for fellowship positions along with new applicants.
The application includes a statement of progress and plans for the additional
year of funding. Postdoctoral fellows annually submit progress reports and
training plans to the Training Advisory Committee. The Committee, in collaboration
with the mentoring teams, reviews, modifies (as appropriate), and approves
the reports and training plans. In addition, the Program's leadership meets
every six months with fellows and mentor teams to assess progress and problems.
CCEP leadership also conduct exit interviews with fellows completing the CCEP.









